Buying Into Cycling For The Environment

Bike Radar has an excellent piece on the impact mountain biking has on the environment. The article casts light on the ripple effect our cycling and our purchases have on the environment. The whole article it really worth a read.

When we ask bike distributors what eco-friendly products they stock, the answer is usually: “All our products are green.” It’s wrong, but it’s an easy and understandable trap to fall into. Isn’t cycling green? As a form of transport it is, and as a low impact way to engage with the great outdoors it’s a green activity, if you ride responsibly.

But consider the energy used in manufacturing frames, the carbon footprint of hauling components from their Far East birthplace, and the fact that most of us drive to the trail or bike shop, then we’re entering a grey area. For their product launch last year, one company even shuttled the press up to the test trail by helicopter. So, is mountain biking any greener than, say, playing squash?

Now, as I am poised to buy a new bike, I am confronted with including the environmental calculous into my purchase. I also need to evaluate where I failed in the past.

My current frame lasted 3 years. I was hoping to move it to secondary status after five years, but that didn't happen. At the moment the frame has opportunity to become smelting waste or wall art. I'll have to choose the latter. Luckily for me, the frame was the cheapest major part of the bike.

On the positive side, I believe that you often must pay a little more for quality and so many of my parts are still useable and should be for a long time. In the 16,000mi. or 26,000km I put on the bike, I replaced the aluminum stem, a couple chains, a rim (bent), a lock ring, bar tape a few times, and I just had a bottom bracket in stalled. The Bike Radar article rings of irony if you consider the magazine's most essential purpose, is to entice readers into consuming the (add superlative here) product being sold by the sponsors who buy ad space. One of the things I hardly ever felt over the past 3 years of owning my Salsa was bike lust. I rarely, I can't say never, but I rarely thought about "upgrading". I overspent a little in the beginning for parts that would satisfy me for the life of the parts. That was the beauty of my Chris King parts.

My Chris King hubs were able to be easily cleaned and refurbished without having to throw anything out. Many of my other components are still in great condition. They are not ultra light carbon, but they are light-enough, strong and reliable. My King headset did, in fact, outlast my bike. Longevity and Chris King's environmental practices are why I will continue to put Kings on future bikes despite the high short term costs.

I am also not a huge fan of Carbon Fiber composites. For bike components, this is where the metals...shine... over CF. Alloy can be recycled, steel is repairable and can last decades. Despite its initial price tag and difficult extraction, titanium can last a lifetime with no discernible change in performance. I think the jury is still out on the longevity of current composite frames, but once it breaks what do you do with carbon? You can't put it in the ground and let it biodegrade. You can't melt it down and make something new. You can't hammer it into key chains, salt shakers or church keys. The carbon fiber recycling industry is still in its infancy and there is still a long way to go to keep, not just your busted fork, but also the industrial waste from the production of your carbon fork, out of the incinerator or landfill. Cycling Satin Cessena has some insights into the future of composite recycling at the bottom of her great article on materials and efficiency. Currently, the best bet for a busted composite frame or fork is an expensive repair by folks like Craig Calfee.

Personally, I feel spending a little more for longevity and to support those companies that have made changes to be more environmentally friendly is an excellent first step.

Links:

• Thinking About Cycling expounds on the Cultural Production of Cycling. This article echoes one of my own older posts. here
• Armstrong contemplates the future... now that he is really old.
• Pack of drunk cyclists terrorize Tinsel Town.
• iamnotacyclist does a reality check on how we ride.
• Not learning from history. German cyclist discovers Russia too cold to invade in winter.

Bits and Pieces: Looking At My Parts

Since returning from Seattle I have hardly logged any saddle time, but there are things that need to get done. One of the things I did do while I was in Seattle, was buy a new set of pedals.

I picked up the Crank Brothers Eggbeater 3 pedals to replace my Candy SL set. I was very pleased with my Candies, but I was ready for something different.

What I really like about the Crank Brothers system is its simplicity. The four sided clip makes for easy clipping and unclipping. I think the latter may be the most important. I have actually seen a few people struggle with popping out of the typical Shimano-style pedals. This is good for mud, dirt, areas with heavy traffic, and especially for beginners. The worst is watching someone run out of gas on a hill and panic to unclip or fall over. The CBs are intuitive. The clipping process can also be done back to front or front to back. If you over step, slide back or under-step, slide forward. The CBs provide plenty of float to allow the rider room to adjust for comfort and position.

I chose the Eggbeater over the Candy because I felt the plasic platform was unnecessary. It is actually easier for me to clip-in when there is only a clip and no platform to slide on.

Crank Brothers has released all new redesigns this year with more rigid construction and bearings that are sealed from water and dirt. Bike Radar has an excellent article about the redesign and the entire line of CB pedals.

From my initial testing I have found these pedals to be an excellent replacement and would implore anyone interested in SPD pedals to use Crank Brothers.

Update: 

Over longer term use I have found Crank Brothers pedals to be unreliable and very high maintenance. Crank Brothers offers a rebuild kit... and for good reason. You're gonna need it. The down side is that you are constantly riding without peace of mind. and when you send pedals in to be repaired, you are out of action for however long it takes to repair the pedals. 

The second piece of equipment I would like to gush over are my Chris King hubs.

I noticed my rear wheel wasn't spinning like I wanted and thought I would have Rocky at T-Mosaic take a look.

I guess I have been busy riding and using my bike, so my hubs were in sore need of servicing after 3 years of use. Rocky cleaned out all the crud, re-greased and my wheel is rolling like a brand new wheel.

Chris King has a reputation for being expensive and light, but not the lightest components on the planet. The difference is that King components are made to last and are completely serviceable. Many component companies make parts that may last three years, but once they are done... they're done. Replacements can get expensive and the spent parts sit in a landfill.

I'd rather spend the money up front than take an unexpected hit in the wallet down the road.

Unfortunately, King hubs are hard to find in Taiwan. a lot of people just can't or don't want to front load a purchase with more expensive gear. Hubs are usually a weak point of a complete bike purchase and that is where companies feel they can skimp and move bikes. I actually had to order my hubs from Aspire Velotech. They have free worldwide shipping and I had my hubs in 5 days. Kings are worthy of serious consideration and are well worth the price.